Corrupción – Cuba – Corruption
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support in paying for servers. Thank you.
Calendar
October 2015
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Translate (from Es)
Archives

With Hard Currency the Embargo is a Joke

Cuba: With Hard Currency the Embargo is a Joke / Ivan Garcia
Posted on October 22, 2015

Ivan Garcia, 22 October 2015 — The Commodore Center Mall, to the west of
Havana, is one of the preferred shopping sites for the official
intellectual jet set, who from their newsletter launch poison darts
against “Yankee imperialism and its cruel economic blockade against
Cuba.” But in their private lives they dazzle themselves with products
Made in the USA.

In this chain of stores flanking the Commodore Hotel, the showcases
display Nike, New Balance, Levi denims, Colgate toothpaste, Palmolive
soap and Head & Shoulders shampoo, among more than fifty other American
brands.

In an open air cafe, you can drink Coca-Cola and enjoy German sausages
flavored with Del Monte tomato sauce. On the other side of Avenida
Tercera, in the Business Center, appliances such as Black & Decker
electric skillets, RCA blenders and Hamilton rice cookers are sold, all
patented in the USA.

I invite you to tour the twenty international pharmacies tucked away in
Havana. There you can buy products made by Johnson & Johnson,
antihistamines and antibiotics and other products from US labs.

At any Havana store you show up at with hard currency you can buy
California apples and Kentucky chicken thighs. Since 1993, all this
merchandise, produced by the “Revolution’s number one enemy” is sold
legally on the Island to those Cubans who, in one way or another, come
to possess dollars, euros, or convertible pesos.

In the offices of national institutions, some 90% of the computers use
Windows software. And in those areas, where one might think that cheap
nationalism, the registered brand of Casa Castro, generates guys
allergic to Yankee paraphernalia, you can calmly observe a police
official wearing RayBans, taking statements from a regime opponent
accused of being a “mercenary and lackey of the American government” on
an HP computer.

How rigorously and to what extent does the US economic and financial
embargo affect Cuba, I asked a university professor, a specialist in
economic matters.

The man cleared his throat and responded, “There is plenty of political
propaganda. The story is simple. Fidel Castro nationalized dozens of
American companies and in the give and take of foreign policy,
Eisenhower stopped buying Cuban sugar, our main export product and then
the legislature decreed a partial economic and financial embargo and
then Kennedy strengthened it and in 1996, after Cuba shot down the four
Brothers to the Rescue planes, Clinton codified it.” He drinks some
mineral water from a bottle and continues:

“From whatever side you look at it, the Palace of the Revolution or
White House, the embargo is the product of a political dispute that
brought the dirty war and subversion on both sides. Fidel Castro
believed he was licensed to export guerrillas to Latin America, support
with arms and instructors the Colombian and El Salvadoran guerrillas,
and offer political asylum to people from the United States who were
terrorists and criminals,” he explains in a neutral voice.

He continues, “Of course in economic terms, Cuba has taken the brunt of
that dirty war. Before 1959, 95% of our economic structure depended on
trade with the United States. But in the 38 years we were subsidized by
the Kremlin (1961-1989), the effects of the embargo were hardly noticed.
If the Cuban government had been proactive and established a nationalist
and sovereign strategy — without participating in the African wars which
is one of the causes of the current extensive economic crisis, and had
placed an emphasis on saving resources, economic expansion and a free
market and doing business with the West — the current effects of the
embargo would be minor.

“It is a heavy burden, especially financially, because transactions
can’t be made in dollars and that increases the costs of freight and
exports. The US Office of Foreign Assets Control’s closing of foreign
banks to commerce with Cuba has been a hard blow to credit and
businesses. But since December 17th [the day Cuba and the US announced a
reestablishment of relations], Obama has partially dismantled the embargo.”

“Still, it remains. And it is complicated to buy medicines or food
paying cash, because due to the economic disaster the Cuban central bank
has no liquidity. In addition, there is a marked government emphasis on
favoring military companies and groups under the harmful control of the
family capitalism which is in control in Cuba.

“There is also a harmful Cuban State embargo that affects private
entrepreneurs and ordinary citizens. Look at the abusive customs tariffs
and you can see that the State is not interested in making things easier
for people to get ahead by their own efforts,” concludes the Havana
professor.

The olive-green autocracy cites economic losses of more than 121 billion
dollars. The US executive demands 7 billion in compensation for
nationalizations carried out by Fidel Castro against American properties.

The reestablishment of relations between the two countries who
experienced their own Cold War would allow the development of a strategy
that would satisfy the two parties.

But for now, General Castro’s government simply makes demands without
giving anything in return. It considers itself a victim of the embargo.
And asks for redress with a volume of capital that is more than nine
times the 13 billion dollars of the Marshall Plan for post-war Europe in
1947.

Silverio, a banker, believes that the White House must repair the
economic damage, “but not this monstrous amount of money that Raul
Castro is asking for. An exit may be that the United States invests in
public works and housing for poor people, which is the majority in
Cuba. And not by giving those resources to the Cuban State which,
through lack of transparency, corruption and inefficiency, would result
in some of the money fattening the pockets of a few,” he says.

Litigation and negotiations on damages from the embargo and compensation
from the Castro government to US businesses have only begun.

Meanwhile, in Cuba, with enough hard currency, the rigors of the embargo
are a joke.

Photo: Store where Nikes are sold in Havana. Taken from “What embargo:
Top U.S. brands sell in Cuba,” AP dispatch published in May 2007 by NBC
News.

Source: Cuba: With Hard Currency the Embargo is a Joke / Ivan Garcia |
Translating Cuba –
translatingcuba.com/cuba-with-hard-currency-the-embargo-is-a-joke-ivan-garcia/

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *