Corrupción – Cuba – Corruption
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support in paying for servers. Thank you.
Calendar
March 2016
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Translate (from Es)
Archives

Cuban Dissidents in Western Democrats’ Selfies

Cuban Dissidents in Western Democrats’ Selfies / Iván García
Posted on March 12, 2016

After leaving mass at St. Rita of Casia Church in Miramar, members of
the Ladies in White gather a few meters from the church at Ghandi Park
under a banner that reads, “TodosMarchamos” (We All March). The have
been coming here for more than forty-four consecutive Sundays and their
peaceful protests almost always end in assaults and arrests. From the
New York Times.

Ivan Garcia, 7 March 2016 — Between repression by the regime and the
disdain of democratic governments, peaceful opposition in Cuba is paying
too high a price for its shortcomings and lack of popular support. But
let us not forget that they are victims, not the ones responsible for
our national disaster.

The best screenwriters are undeniably good at turning villains into
saints and can very discretely upend the ethical values of their readers
and viewers.

Even those who never run a red light are pained to see criminals like
Vito Corleone in The Godfather or Pablo Escobar in a Colombian
mini-series caught and crushed by law enforcement.

The moral reversal that leads an audience to applaud when a bank robber
escapes with the money in a Hollywood film is applicable to political
dramas as well.
I find it hard to believe that François Hollande or Barack Obama,
presidents of stable democracies, are thrilled at the prospect of
sitting down with a consummate autocrat like Raul Castro.

The government of the Castro brothers has all the ingredients of a true
dictatorship. Cuba is the only country in the concert of western nations
that outlaws independent political parties and non-governmental media
outlets.

Let’s get serious. While economic strain will always be better than
sanctions, one cannot ignore certain basic truths. Cuba is no El Dorado
when it comes to business. The country lacks an independent judiciary
and a regulatory framework, essential elements for local entrepreneurs.
The domestic market is also small and has limited purchasing power.

The game plan could be a bit more subtle. The goal of this political
chess match is to dismantle the Castro’s economic and ideological
madhouse with a high-profile strategy.

But leaders of democratic countries should not sidestep Cuba’s
opposition figures, much less take selfies with them in back rooms just
to appear politically correct.

The Castros are not the movie’s good guys. They are part of an
entrenched gang that confuses democracy with personal loyalty. The
failure of the revolution, the inefficiency of the system and material
hardships were not caused by the opposition, none of whom hold any
official positions.

I understand that one must negotiate with those in power. And the
Castros have almost absolute control in Cuba. But not listening with
your own ears to those who are being repressed is a huge political
blunder for those who present themselves as democrats.

And that is what is happening. Since the restoration of diplomatic
relations on December 17, numerous important American politicians and
officials have visited Havana. Very few of them, however, have met with
any dissidents or, if they have, they have spoken only with that segment
of the opposition that approves of change.

They have always been last minute meetings involving coffee and
ambiguous speeches. They end with an official looking at his watch, then
quickly saying goodbye lest he miss his flight. This pattern could be
observed on August 14, 2015 after the opening of the US embassy in Cuba.

The Department of State has not extended invitations to any dissidents
or independent journalists. The one previous meeting was brief. When it
was time for the batboys to gather up the equipment and photos were
being taken — Cuban dissidents love to have their pictures taken — the
talk turned to trivial issues.

It is not known if Barack Obama or the American embassy has scheduled
any meetings with opposition figures or independent journalists during
the upcoming presidential visit, scheduled for March 21 and 22.

The Cuban dissident movement is not a virtuous wasteland. Quite the
opposite. Though marginalized, beaten and censured, its members continue
to pound their fist on the table with authority. They do not, however,
have an effective strategy for attracting followers from the ranks of
ordinary Cubans.

They walk through the streets as though invisible. Their lobbying
efforts are directed overseas. They have not been able to engage or
enlist their neighbors to their cause. And communitarian, political
initiatives such as Candidates for Change, an effort to promote
democracy through participation in parliamentary elections, is looked
down upon by some dissident leaders.

Is there disagreement? Yes, there is. A reasonable approach in such a
contentious situation would be to come up with a common platform in
which various groups or factions can agree on at most three or four
common points.

This was the approach tried in 1996 by the Cuban Council and more
recently in Venezuela by the Unity Roundtable for Democratic Action. But
the towering egos of the dissidents always gets in the way of their good
intentions.

Are they receiving money from US government foundations? Certainly.
Engaging in political acitivism takes money. The strategy should be one
of transparency, democracy within organizations and accountability.

Purists might see this as interference by a foreign government in the
internal affairs of a sovereign state. But I would assure them that not
one cent has been spent on the purchase of arms, the preparation of
Molotov cocktails or for drafting a plan to assault a military barracks,
as Fidel Castro did on July26, 1953.

The funds that the US government gives to dissident groups are public
expenditures. The bulk of the money is spent on bureaucracy or goes into
the pockets of those in Florida who have turned anti-Castroism into an
industry.

It is also certainly true that there are and have been dissidents in
Cuba who appropriate what is not theirs. Shortages, a lack of civic
mindedness or lack of self-control have led some to act like tribal
chieftains.

But you cannot put everyone in the same boat. Corruption and a lack of
transparency are even worse in the regime. A dissident is not divorced
from the reality in which he lives.

If they behave like a Fidel Castro in civilian clothes, it is because
they were born and grew up in a country led by military strongmen. Both
dissidents and government officials wear guayaberas. They do not know
how to take advantage of new tools like the internet, their speech is
filled with jargon and they do not know the value of smiling for the
cameras.

The shortcomings of Castro officials are replicated in their
antagonists. But there is one notable difference: peaceful opponents
endure physical assaults, arrests and acts of repudiation.

Democrats from western countries would be acting consistently with their
own teachings if they listened to the frustrations of the opposition. It
would be a good way to avoid betraying themselves. Politics is the art
of the possible.

Ivan Garcia

Marti Noticias, March 3, 2016

Source: Cuban Dissidents in Western Democrats’ Selfies / Iván García |
Translating Cuba –
translatingcuba.com/cuban-dissidents-in-western-democrats-selfies-ivn-garca/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *