How Democracy Disappeared from Cuba
How Democracy Disappeared from Cuba / Roberto Alvarez Quiñones
From the blog of Dimas Castellano: In response to an article in Diario
de Cuba about different views on human rights, one reader noted that he
would like to read an account of how democracy disappeared from Cuba. In
response, Roberto Alvarez Quiñones wrote “At Democracy’s Funeral,” an
article which I am posting below.
At Democracy’s Funeral
by Roberto Alvarez Quiñones
Although — etymologically speaking — the term means power of the
people, the existence and functioning of democracy requires, among
others, the following instruments, rights and freedoms: Suffrage, to
designate their representatives; equality before the law, to compete for
positions; the referendum, to reject or approve the provisions of
government; the plebiscite, to approve or disapprove rules and laws; the
popular initiative, to submit proposals on issues of national interest;
revocation, to override by vote government decisions and to dismiss
officials; juries, to collaborate with the judiciary; separation of
powers, to avoid its concentration in one or more people; a multiparty
system, to provide choices between various options and candidates.
For these instruments to be effective, people must enjoy the freedoms of
opinion, expression, assembly and association. They are the foundation
for political, economic, social, cultural, environmental and
informational rights. These requirements, endorsed in the constitution,
form the basis of the rule of law, which allows the people to be the
active agent of power.
The seeds of Cuban democracy can be found in the Constitution of
Guáimaro. They took shape in the form of freedoms of press, association
and assembly, as outlined in the first article of the Zanjón Pact. They
were expanded in the Constitution of 1901, which added key instruments
such as habeas corpus and separation of powers.
Worker, student, farmer, racial and women’s movements achieved successes
such as the eight-hour work day, university autonomy, women’s suffrage,
the collapse of Gerardo Machado’s government, the constituent assembly
of 1939 and the Constitution of 1940. Article 37 of this constitution
allowed for the existence and operation of political organizations
opposed to the elected government. Article 40 legitimized resistance for
the protection of individual rights (the legal basis of Fidel Castro’s
defense during his trial for the Moncada attacks). Article 87 recognized
the legitimacy of private property and, more broadly, its key role in
society. And article 97 instituted “universal and equal suffrage through
secret ballot” by which Cuban women could exercise the right to vote.
With this democratic foundation, the people elected as president
Fulgencio Batista in 1940, Ramón Grau in 1944 and Carlos Prío in 1948.
However, the increase in the cost of living along with political and
administrative corruption and the growth of organized crime during this
period created instability and led to a military coup that upended the
constitutional order in 1952.
Among the many responses to the coup, two stood out. The first occurred
on July 26, 1953 when Fidel Castro led the assault on the Moncada
Barracks, The second took shape in January 1954 with the Civic
Resistance Movement led by José Miró Cardona.
Seeking legitimacy, in 1954 Batista called “elections” in which he was
ratified as president. On taking office in 1955, he reestablished the
1940 constitution and granted amnesty to political prisoners, among them
the Moncada Barracks attackers.
During the struggle against the Frank País dictatorship, the head of
sabotage for the 26th of July Movement (M-26-7) suggested that Fidel
Castro, its leader, and members of the Civil Resistance Movement form a
provisional government. To this end, a meeting was held in the Sierra
Maestra in July 1957 which included Raúl Chibás, head of the Orthodox
Party, and Felipe Pazos, former president of the National Bank of Cuba.
The resulting document was the “Manifesto of the People of Cuba.” Three
months later Felipe Pazos along with M-26-7 members Lester Rodriguez and
Jorge Sotús met with exile civic associations and signed the “Pact of
Miami,” which outlined “the manner in which the Revolution should be led
and the political program that would be put in place after victory.”
The leadership of M-26-7 rejected the pact. In a letter dated December
14, 1957 Castro told its signatories that what was important “was not
unity in and of itself but rather the foundation on which unity is
based.” On May 3, 1958, an agreement was reached at Alto de Mompié in
the Sierra Maestra to adopt a single, centralized command structure,
with Castro as both secretary general of M-26-7 and commander-in-chief
of all revolutionary forces. On July 20, 1958 a meeting was convened in
Venezuela with representatives of various exile organizations, which led
to the creation of the Revolutionary Civic Front and the “Caracas Pact.”
On August 11, 1958 José Miró Cardona was named coordinator of the
Revolutionary Civic Front and Manuel Urrutia was nominated as
provisional president of Cuba.
On day 1, after the victory of rebel forces in January 1959, Manuel
Urrutia assumed the presidency. The next day, in violation of the 1940
constitution — which stated that the President of the Republic was the
supreme commander of the country’s land, air and sea forces — he
declined this leadership role in favor of Fidel Castro. On day 3 a
cabinet made up of reformists, conservatives and revolutionaries was
formed, with José Miró Cardona serving as prime minister.
On February 7, the Revolution — the new source of law — replaced the
Constitution of 1940 with the Basic Law of the Cuban State. It conferred
the powers of the presidency on an unelected prime minister and the
powers of Congress on the newly created Council of Ministers, without
any separation of powers. On February 13 José Miro Cardona resigned and
on February 16 Fidel Castro assumed the post of prime minister.
The posts of governor, mayor and city council member were abolished,
judicial bodies dissolved, and judges and magistrates relieved of their
duties. There was no more separation of powers and cabinet members who
had belonged to the civic movement were replaced.
Disputes between Manuel Urrutia — an enemy of communism — and Fidel
Castro worsened in the first months until, on July 17, 1959, Castro
resigned. This forced the resignation of the president and Castro’s
return as prime minister.
Gone were the traditional parties — the March 13 the Revolutionary
Directorate, the Socialist People’s Party and the M-26-7 — which in 1962
were folded into the Integrated Revolutionary Organizations (ORI). After
its leader, Anibal Escalante, was dismissed, it was taken over by Fidel
Castro. In January 1963 the ORI became the United Party of the Socialist
Revolution, which in 1965 became what is now the Cuban Communist Party
(PCC). From that moment on, the positions of commander-in-chief of the
armed forces, head of government and secretary of the only political
party were held by one person. The promise to hold elections became the
slogan “Elections. What for?” Democracy had received the coup de grace.
On January 22, 1959 the CTC (Cuban Confederation of Workers) was
replaced by the Revolutionary CTC. The variety of student, women, farmer
and employer associations were reduced to the Union of Young Communists,
the Federation of Cuban Women and the National Association of Small
Farmers. The rest vanished or became subordinate to the PCC.
University autonomy, guaranteed in article 53 of the Constitution of
1940, ceased to exist. The written and broadcast press, the vast network
of cinemas, publishing and cultural institutions — all came under the
control of the PCC. Cuban society lost its independent associations and
opportuniites for civic engagement. It became constrained by a slogan
from Castro’s June 1961 speech: Within the Revolution, everything:
outside the Revolution, nothing. Ownership of the means of production
became increasingly concentrated in the hands of the state until the
Revolutionary Offensive of 1968 dealt the final blow.
As conflicts between states tend to de-escalate the conflicts within
states, so too did confrontation with the United States facilitate the
disarmament of democracy. But it was not the cause. The dismantling
began before the rupture in diplomatic relations.
In spite of advances made between 1952 to 1959, the way in which
democracy disappeared from Cuba indicates that Cubans’ civic formation
had not reached the level of maturity necessary to prevent its loss. It
was a hard and painful lesson that demonstrates the importance
of instruments, rights and freedoms that allow the people to be active
agents of power.
Havana, April 8, 2016
2. Cuban Revolutionary Government; Genesis and First Steps, Luís M. Buch
Rodríguez. Social Sciences Publishing House, Havana, 1999, p.6
3. Manuel Urrutia, presiding jurist in the trial in Santiago de Cuba in
Which a panel of judges unanimously resolved the defendants Involved in
the assault on the Moncada Barracks.
Source: How Democracy Disappeared from Cuba / Roberto Alvarez Quiñones –
Translating Cuba –