Corrupción – Cuba – Corruption
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support in paying for servers. Thank you.
Calendar
November 2016
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
Translate (from Es)
Archives

Fidel Castro is dead

Fidel Castro is dead
BY GLENN GARVIN
ggarvin@MiamiHerald.com

Fidel Castro, who towered over his Caribbean island for nearly five
decades, a shaggy-bearded figure in combat fatigues whose long shadow
spread across Latin America and the world, is dead at age 90. His
brother Raul announced the death late Friday night.

Millions cheered Fidel Castro on the day he entered Havana. Millions
more fled the communist dictator’s repressive police state, leaving
behind their possessions, their families, the island they loved and
often their very lives. It’s part of the paradox of Castro that many
people belonged to both groups.

Few national leaders have inspired such intense loyalty — or such a
wrenching feeling of betrayal. Few fired the hearts of the world’s
restless youth as Castro did when he was young, and few seemed so
irrelevant as Castro when he was old — the last Communist, railing on
the empty, decrepit street corner that Cuba became under his rule.

He held a unique place among the world’s leaders of the past century.
Others had greater impact or won more respect. But none combined his
dynamic personality, his decades in power, his profound effect on his
own country and his provocative role in international affairs.

As he changed the face of Cuba, he remapped South Florida as well,
transforming it from the southernmost tip of the United States to the
northernmost point of Latin America. The suffering of the refugees he
sent pouring into Miami eventually turned to triumph as they forged
economic and political success.

He was a spellbinding orator who was also a man of action. His tall and
powerful build was matched by an outsized ego, boundless energy and
extraordinary luck that carried him to victory as a guerrilla leader in
1959 against nearly impossible odds, then helped him survive countless
plots hatched by his countless enemies.

He ended American domination of the island’s economy, swept away the old
political system and the traditional army, nationalized large and small
land holdings and brought reforms in education and healthcare.

He also was a ruthless dictator, the Maximum Leader who reneged on his
promise of free elections, executed thousands of opponents, imprisoned
tens of thousands, installed a Communist regime and made his island a
pawn in the Cold War. His alliance with the Soviet Union brought the
world to the brink of nuclear war in 1962.

The Cuban Missile Crisis was neither Castro’s first nor last
confrontation with the United States, though it was certainly the most
epic. No other individual has ever tormented Washington more or longer.
At age 12, Castro wrote to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, congratulating him
on his third inauguration as president and impudently asking for a
dollar. By the time he was 35, two American presidents had devoted a
considerable amount of time and effort to killing him.

Over and over, whether by arming Latin American revolutionaries or
sheltering fugitives from U.S. justice or unleashing great waves of
refugees, Castro enraged his great enemy to the north — and often threw
it into domestic disarray as well. The U.S. political controversies that
followed the 1980 Mariel boatlift and the 2000 custody battle over Elián
González played a large role in costing first Jimmy Carter and then Al
Gore the presidency.

Faced with hostility from the United States, which sponsored an invasion
by Cuban exiles in 1961 and relentlessly (if sometimes comically)
plotted his assassination, Castro turned the island into a fortress
guarded by one of the region’s most powerful military machines.

But the guns pointed inward, too. He created a repressive state that
rigidly controlled the arts, the press, the airwaves. An efficient
secret police force was aided by neighborhood spies and pro-government
mobs that attacked those who dared to call for democratic change.
Cultural enemies were vulnerable, too; well into the 1970s, Castro was
imprisoning gays and long-haired young people in work camps.

Castro bragged that he would free his island of economic dependence on
the United States, and he did — but only by becoming even more dependent
on another foreign power based nearly 6,000 miles away in Moscow. Cuba
ran up billions of dollars in debt for weapons, oil, machinery, food and
other supplies. And when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Cuba’s
crippled economy imploded, bringing new hardships to a population that
already had suffered decades under his mismanagement.

Hundreds of thousands fled the society Castro created. The exodus began
early with the powerful and affluent and continued with former comrades
who found themselves in opposition to his rule. Next to go were the
middle class and professionals and, finally, just about anyone who had
the courage to grab a boat or cobble together a raft for the perilous
crossing of the Florida Straits.

Castro, although always controversial, once seemed to embody a fresh,
youthful approach to his island’s conflicts. Few moments in Cuban
history rival the euphoria of Jan. 8, 1959, when the black-bearded
comandante rode a tank into Havana with his swaggering rebel fighters,
making their way through streets filled with cheering throngs. President
Fulgencio Batista had fled a week earlier.

To his followers — and admirers around the world — Castro offered a
vision of liberation, morality and enlightenment. Many believed his
promise of a “humanistic” revolution based on nationalism — not
communism — with agrarian reform, free elections and the restoration of
the liberal 1940 constitution.

For millions of Cubans, hope turned to bitter feelings of betrayal as
Castro quickly pushed aside former comrades in arms, jailed those who
protested, ridiculed the idea of elections and converted Cuba to a
one-party Communist state and Soviet satellite. He then proclaimed that
he had been a Marxist-Leninist all along.

If his open embrace of communism made him a pariah not only to
Washington but to many of his own countrymen, Castro nonetheless became
an icon to young leftists around the world disillusioned with the
revolutionary sclerosis of the Soviet Union. Hundreds of thousands would
give their lives in fruitless guerrilla movements he inspired in places
like El Salvador, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Colombia, Peru, Uruguay,
Argentina, Chile, Namibia, Angola and Zaire.

From whisper to roar
“As you may well know,” Castro said during a 1993 speech, “my job is to
talk.” His orations were legendary. Without a text, but with a crowd of
supporters cheering him on in Havana’s Plaza de la Revolución, Castro
could hold forth for hours. His record, in 1968, was a meandering
discourse that lasted nearly 12 hours. On the day he officially stepped
down from the Cuban presidency in 2008, a biologist in Havana told a
Miami Herald reporter with obvious relief: “Now I can watch my Brazilian
telenovelas without worrying that they’re going to be interrupted by a
six-hour speech.”

A Castro speech might start as a friendly chat, then morph into a dry
report on sugar production statistics or a scholarly lecture on the
benefits of hygiene. As the pace picked up, the voice would dip to a
hoarse whisper or launch a series of ringing questions that drew shouted
responses from the multitude.

Warming to a theme — perhaps the supposed threat of a Yanqui invasion —
the whisper would grow to a roar and then a rhythmic wave of shouts,
repeating key phrases like a tent-revival evangelist reaching out to
save souls. The words would tumble out, by turns high-flown, vulgar,
jovial, indignant — finally winding down in raspy exhaustion with the
benediction: Patria o muerte, venceremos! (Fatherland or death, we shall
triumph!)

In later years, as the former Soviet bloc nations moved toward open
societies and capitalism, leaving him virtually alone as a hard-line
Communist, the tag line changed to a defiant Socialismo o muerte —
socialism or death.

A privileged childhood
Castro was born Aug. 13, 1926, near the village of Birán on Cuba’s
northeastern coast.

His father, Angel Castro, a native of Galicia, Spain, started out
laboring in sugar fields for the U.S.-owned United Fruit Co. but worked
his way up until he owned a 10,000-acre farm with hundreds of workers.

One of Angel’s servants, Lina Ruz, was the mother of Fidel and his six
siblings — including Raúl, who assumed power on July 31, 2006, after
Fidel fell ill. Angel and Lina were married several years after Fidel
was born, and Fidel was not legally recognized as a Castro until he was
17. Despite the household’s rocky domestic issues, Fidel mostly enjoyed
the privileged, outdoor childhood of a land baron’s son, climbing hills,
swimming in rivers, hunting with a shotgun.

When Fidel was 15, in 1941, his father sent him to Colegio Belén in
Havana, an exclusive Jesuit prep school for rich boys.

At Belén, Castro was remembered as an imposing figure — good-natured, a
talented student and a star of the basketball and baseball teams. He
maintained an interest in sports in later life, making Cuba a regional
power in amateur athletics. But, contrary to a report widely circulated
in the American press, he never tried out for the U.S. major leagues.

His love for baseball would last a lifetime and was perhaps the only one
of his interests to rival politics.

In October 1945, Castro enrolled at Havana University’s law school. He
immediately plunged into student politics at a time of gangsterismo —
battles between armed rival gangs. Castro carried a pistol and was
accused, though never convicted, of involvement in two murders and
another attempt.

There were Communist groups at the university, but Castro didn’t join
them. He remained independent for a time, then in 1947 aligned himself
with the Ortodoxos, a party led by liberal reformer Eduardo Chibás.
Castro served as a top aide until Chibás fatally shot himself in 1951
during a dramatic radio broadcast, attempting to awaken Cubans to what
he called social injustice.

As a student, Castro twice became enmeshed in violent international
incidents that marked his developing obsession for revolutionary politics.

In 1947, he joined a group plotting to overthrow the dictatorship of
Rafael Trujillo in the Dominican Republic. Cuban police crushed the
expedition before it could leave the island; Castro escaped by swimming
across a bay.

In April 1948, as diplomats gathered in Bogotá to found the Organization
of American States, Castro and other young Cubans traveled there to help
organize a student anti-imperialist movement. He met Colombian populist
politician Jorge Eliécer Gaitán and was on his way to see him again when
Gaitán was assassinated on the street, a killing that set off two days
of rioting later known as the Bogotazo.

Castro, then 21, joined in the street fighting, seizing a rifle at a
police station that had been stormed by a mob. His activities in Bogotá
prompted a cable to Washington from the U.S. Embassy in Havana on April
26, 1948, the first of what eventually would be hundreds of thousands of
official U.S. documents pondering Castro’s intentions.

Observed an embassy staffer in Havana: “It must be concluded that, while
no proof has been offered of his being a Communist, there is ample proof
that he is a thoroughly undesirable character and a potential gangster.”

Mysterious personal life
On Oct. 12, 1948, while still in law school, Castro married Mirta
Díaz-Balart, a philosophy student. The couple honeymooned in the United
States, and a son, Fidelito, was born the next year. But owing to
Castro’s frenetic political activity and his voracious appetite for
women, the marriage was doomed. They were divorced in 1955. Mirta
Díaz-Balart remarried and moved to Spain. The estrangement, both social
and political, extended to the rest of the Díaz-Balart family — most of
which moved to Miami, where several Castro nephews eventually would
become powerful politicians and journalists.

Castro always maintained a careful reserve about his private life. “In
this sense, I have reserved for myself a total freedom,” he said in a
1999 interview. It was only then that it was publicly acknowledged in
Cuba that he had been living since the 1960s with a schoolteacher named
Dalia Soto del Valle, from the city of Trinidad on the south side of the
island. They have five sons, all born since the mid-’60s.

In all, Castro is known to have fathered as many as 11 children by four
different women. There were rumors of others by his many mistresses.

His relations with his children were distant and sometimes strained. His
only daughter, Alina Fernández, aligned herself with Cuba’s dissident
movement and tried for years to leave the island before she escaped in
1993 with a false passport.

Now living in Miami, Fernández is a harsh critic of her father. “When
people tell me he’s a dictator, I tell them that’s not the right word,”
she said. “Strictly speaking, Fidel is a tyrant. I have looked up the
two words in the dictionary. A dictator is ‘a person who is granted
absolute powers to face a national emergency on a temporary basis.’ A
tyrant is an ‘absolute ruler unrestrained by law, who usurps people’s
rights.’ ”

Perhaps the closest relationship Castro ever had with a woman was with
Celia Sánchez, a thin, prim doctor’s daughter who joined Castro at his
guerrilla hide-out in the Sierra Maestra in 1957.

Eight years older than Castro, she became his personal secretary, never
far from his side. Some believe she was also his lover. Though Castro
never talked about his feelings for her, it was clear that she was the
one who brought order to his chaotic life. He declared a national day of
mourning when Sánchez died in 1980.

A failed attack
After Castro graduated from law school in 1950, he became a
lawyer-politician, representing poor clients and investigating
government corruption. In 1951, he launched a vigorous campaign for a
seat in Cuba’s congress.

But his dreams of traditional politics ended abruptly in 1952, when
Batista — a one-time populist reformer who had grown fond of power —
seized the government in a coup and canceled the election.

While older politicians pondered how to respond, Castro, 25, declared
personal war on the new dictatorship. Over the next 16 months, he built
a clandestine, armed revolutionary organization, recruiting from the
ranks of the Ortodoxo Party.

He opened his war July 26, 1953, leading a dawn attack by 111 poorly
armed young rebels on Cuba’s second-largest army base, the 400-man
Moncada Barracks in Santiago de Cuba on the eastern end of the island.
The idea was to seize weapons, take control of a strategic portion of
Cuba and call for a nationwide uprising.

But everything went wrong from the beginning. Shooting started
prematurely, only three rebels actually fought their way into the base
and Castro’s fighters made a disorderly retreat.

Sixty-nine rebels were killed — most of them tortured to death or
executed after capture. The army and police lost 19 men. Castro escaped,
only to be captured a few days later.

The Moncada attack was a military disaster, but it made Castro the top
anti-Batista leader overnight. He turned his trial in Santiago into an
indictment of the dictatorship. In his final courtroom speech, he
reportedly concluded with the phrase: “Condemn me, it does not matter!
History will absolve me!” (It would be years before scholars would note
the ringing phrase was lifted from another dramatic courtroom oration —
by Adolf Hitler, on trial in Germany for an attempted 1923 coup.)

In prison, Castro wrote furiously, converting his trial speech into a
formal document smuggled out for publication. It became his platform
during the struggle against Batista.

Batista released Castro on May 15, 1955, as part of a general amnesty,
18 months into his sentence.

Fundraising in Miami
Castro traveled briefly the same year to Miami, where he spoke at the
old Flagler movie theater downtown, asking supporters for funds. “I
swear to you,” he promised the cheering crowd, “in Cuba, it’ll be us or
them.” Then he went to Mexico, where he rebuilt his tiny revolutionary
band and organized an invasion.

There Castro met and recruited Ernesto “Che” Guevara, a 27-year-old
Argentine physician with Marxist ideas who had been expelled from
Guatemala after a CIA-backed coup there the previous year.

On Dec. 2, 1956, Castro, Guevara and 80 followers reached the shore of
Cuba’s Oriente province in a battered American cabin cruiser, the
Granma, wretchedly seasick after a seven-day voyage. The men leaped into
hip-deep mud and struggled through a mangrove swamp to reach land. Most
were killed or captured in the first hours.

Only 16 made it safely to the 4,500-foot ridges of the Sierra Maestra.
There they began a guerrilla campaign to oust Batista, who was backed by
a 40,000-strong security force equipped with tanks, artillery and
U.S.-supplied warplanes.

Castro’s force, however, slowly began to grow. He recruited peasants as
guerrilla fighters and organized intellectuals and middle-class
followers into an urban underground railroad of funds and supplies.

His recruiting was aided immeasurably by his skills at propaganda and
psychological warfare. Castro’s greatest ploy was luring a New York
Times correspondent named Herbert Matthews to his mountain camp. Though
the rebels had barely 20 bedraggled men, Castro marched the same group
past Matthews several times and also staged the arrival of “messengers”
reporting the movement of other (nonexistent) units.

Matthews, convinced Castro controlled a huge army, wrote: “From the look
of things, General Batista cannot possibly hope to suppress the Castro
revolt.” A wave of favorable coverage followed in the foreign press, and
with it, international support.

‘The Americans will pay’
During the war, Castro’s already profound anti-U.S. feelings deepened
when he saw American-supplied bombers used against his positions.

“The Americans will pay dearly,” he wrote to Celia Sánchez at the time.
“When this war is over, a much longer and bigger war will begin for me:
the war I will make against them. I realize that this will be my true
destiny.”

After Batista’s ouster, Castro installed a government with a democratic
cast under President Manuel Urrutia, a former judge, and Prime Minister
José Miró Cardona, a leading lawyer. Within weeks, however, Castro had
taken Miró Cardona’s place as prime minister. On July 17, Urrutia
resigned, accusing Castro of leading Cuba toward communism.

In the first months, Castro cut rents, lowered telephone rates, reformed
the income tax system and passed a land reform law that nationalized
estates larger than 1,000 acres, benefiting thousands of peasants. In
1961, the government launched a campaign aimed at ending illiteracy,
though critics said it had more to do with political indoctrination than
reading and writing.

Even more disturbing was the March 1959 trial of 44 pilots, bombardiers
and mechanics from Batista’s air force. A revolutionary tribunal
acquitted them of crimes against Castro’s guerrillas. An enraged Castro
instantly created a right of appeal for prosecutors. Told Cuban law did
not permit it, he replied: “Revolutionary justice is not based on legal
precepts but on moral conviction.” A second tribunal sent the men to
prison for 30 years.

At that, the airmen were lucky. Though Cuban law did not allow capital
punishment, the revolutionary tribunals were sending a steady stream of
men to the firing squad, often after trials televised from sports
stadiums where handpicked mobs of Castro supporters howled in unison,
paredón! — to the wall!

A steady stream of Cubans began leaving the island for Miami. Those who
couldn’t leave sent their children. From Dec. 26, 1960, to Oct. 22,
1962, more than 14,000 children between the ages of 6 and 18 were flown
to the United States in Operation Pedro Pan, a Catholic Church-backed
initiative that turned into the largest exodus of unaccompanied children
in the history of the Western Hemisphere. By the end of the century, an
estimated three million of its citizens, more than a fifth of the
population, would be living outside Cuba.

Confronting Washington
Castro’s radical domestic policies appeared likely to sour Cuba’s
relations with the United States, but he didn’t wait to find out. He
moved almost immediately to confront Washington, while courting
surprised Soviet leaders.

He brushed aside U.S. offers of economic aid, and he refused to discuss
compensation for U.S.-owned estates confiscated under the agrarian
reform. Meanwhile, in February 1960, Castro signed a trade pact with the
Soviet Union and, three months later, established full diplomatic relations.

As Castro’s leftward march continued, President Dwight Eisenhower
secretly ordered the CIA to begin training Cuban exiles in Guatemala for
an invasion and to explore the possibility of assassinating him.

Between August and October 1960, Castro’s government ordered the
expropriation of the Texaco, Esso and Shell oil refineries, plus more
than 150 other U.S. firms, including Sears Roebuck and Coca-Cola, and
all privately owned sugar mills, banks, large industries and commercial
real estate.

Eisenhower responded by slapping an embargo on all U.S. exports to Cuba
and slashing Cuba’s sugar quota to zero. Before leaving office in
January 1961, Eisenhower broke diplomatic relations.

In April 1961, just three months into John F. Kennedy’s presidency,
about 1,400 CIA-trained exiles invaded Cuba at the Bay of Pigs on the
southern coast. Castro turned the greatest threat to his political
career into his greatest success. He marshaled his army to defeat the
outgunned, outmanned invasion force in three days.

Enraged at their humiliation on the world stage, President Kennedy and
his brother Robert, the attorney general, redoubled their efforts
against Castro. CIA officials would complain later that from 1961 to
1963, they were under almost constant pressure to come up with new ways
to destabilize Castro — or kill him.

Virtually everything, from poisoned scuba-diving suits to exploding
seashells, was considered, and eventually the CIA even turned to the
Mafia to get the job done; all to no avail.

Some historians and intelligence officials believe, however, that the
assassination plots did claim a victim: President Kennedy himself. On
Sept. 7, 1963, Castro made an unusual appearance at a routine diplomatic
reception held at the Brazilian Embassy in Havana. There he approached
an American reporter for the Associated Press.

“If U.S. leaders are aiding terrorist plans to eliminate Cuban leaders,
they themselves will not be safe,” Castro pointedly said. “Let Kennedy
and his brother Robert take care of themselves since they too can be a
victim of an attempt that can cause their deaths.”

Ten weeks later, President Kennedy was killed in Dallas by a sniper’s
bullet fired by a young American admirer of Castro named Lee Harvey
Oswald, who had recently visited the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City
seeking a visa. Over the years, several assassination investigators have
suggested that Oswald’s action was either inspired — or, more
sinisterly, ordered — by Castro.

Communism takes hold
On Dec. 2, 1961, in a dramatic late-night speech, Castro announced to
the nation: “Do I believe in Marxism? I believe absolutely in Marxism!
Did I believe on Jan. 1 [1959]? I believed on Jan. 1! Did I believe on
July 26 [1953]? I believed on July 26!”

But had Castro really been a Communist all along? In his past, there was
no clear evidence to suggest it, although his brother Raúl and Che
Guevara were both Marxists. That question intrigued scholars throughout
his life. Some, noting that in his student years Castro was fascinated
by European fascists, even argued that political thought was irrelevant
to Castro, that his only real interest was in wielding power.

Castro himself always said there were no clues to his Marxism because he
carefully concealed it, especially during the war against Batista.
Cubans were not ready for Marxism, he said.

“Our people could not understand a larger plan,” Castro recalled. “We
supported at that time a program that was within the reach of the
people… My own ideas were more advanced, but I certainly could not be
preaching them publicly to everybody… because that would not have had
a practical result.”

In the end there was no doubt about Castro’s embrace of Marxism. In
1961, he fused his July 26 Movement with Cuba’s old Communist Party
(known as the Popular Socialist Party) and in 1965 formally established
the Cuban Communist Party with himself as first secretary.

His impact on Communist ideology extended far outside Cuba. Before
Castro, the world’s Communist parties were fairly conservative, arguing
that revolutions first required years of political organizing.

But Castro, backed by the force of his own victory over Batista, argued
that armed struggle itself was the best way to create the proper
conditions for revolution. “The duty of a revolutionary is to make the
revolution,” he proclaimed in 1962 in the so-called Second Declaration
of Havana, a clarion call for Communist insurrections throughout the
developing world.

That call was answered by nascent guerrilla movements everywhere from
Argentina to Zaire. The front lines of the confrontation between
communism and the West shifted from Europe to the jungles of the Third
World. The Cold War, which began with tanks facing off in the streets of
Berlin, would turn into peasant skirmishes in villages in Nicaragua and
Angola.

The missile crisis
Between July and September 1962, the Soviet Union began to ship
medium-range and tactical missiles, IL-28 bombers capable of carrying
nuclear bombs and MiG-21 jet fighters to Cuba. Soviet troop strength in
Cuba grew to about 40,000.

In October, Kennedy cited intelligence detailing the presence of the
weapons in Cuba, demanded their removal and ordered U.S. ships to
blockade the island. (Secretly, he extended some carrots with the
sticks, offering to remove U.S. missiles from Turkey as well as a
promise not to invade Cuba again.)

Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev blinked. Without consulting Castro, he
worked out an agreement with Kennedy to withdraw the missiles. The deal
barred the Soviets from establishing a naval base in Cuba and included a
U.S. commitment not to invade the island.

Castro — who, years later, admitted he had urged Khrushchev to fire the
missiles in the event of an American invasion of Cuba — was furious
about being left out of the decision-making. Nonetheless, his dependence
on the Soviets steadily grew. Moscow poured tens of billions of dollars
in direct aid into the island and countless more through a tangled web
of subsidized commercial transactions. For instance, not only could
Castro purchase below-cost Soviet oil and resell it at a profit to other
Latin American countries, but Moscow bought Cuban sugar at premium prices.

For all the Soviet largess, though, the Cuban economy rolled steadily
downhill. Castro’s attempts to bend the laws of economics to his
personal will generally ended in disaster. To fulfill his decree that
the 1970 sugar cane crop would be 10 million tons, twice that of the
year before, the Cuban government diverted nearly all its resources into
the harvest, doubled the cutting season, and sent the army, college
students, government bureaucrats and anyone who had applied for an exit
visa into the fields.

Vast sectors of the Cuban economy were paralyzed by the herculean
effort, and the harvest still fell short by 1.5 million tons. But the
distortions Castro induced into the economy reverberated for years.
Future harvests never got anywhere near 10 million tons.

The pent-up desperation on the island was never more apparent than in
April 1980, when six Cubans broke into the grounds of the Peruvian
Embassy and promptly were granted political asylum. Enraged, Castro
ordered all guards removed from the embassy, only to see nearly 11,000
asylum-seekers crowd into the compound in 28 hours.

Whether in embarrassment or crafty calculation — it was never clear
which — Castro then announced that anyone who wanted to leave Cuba could
go. That launched the astonishing Mariel boatlift, a flotilla of yachts
and fishing boats shuttling back and forth between Key West and the port
of Mariel. When Castro closed it down five months later, more than
120,000 Cubans had fled.

The direct face-off between Castro and Washington eased after the
Kennedy administration. Though the CIA continued to support sporadic
raids and sabotage inside Cuba until 1965, the battle was increasingly
conducted through proxies. In El Salvador and Guatemala, Castro
supported Marxist guerrilla movements against U.S.-backed governments;
in Angola and Nicaragua, things were reversed, with Castro backing the
governments and the United States siding with the guerrillas.

Only once in Castro’s 47-year rule did Cuban and American troops face
one another on a battlefield — when the United States invaded the
Caribbean island of Grenada in 1983, after a Castro-backed government
there dissolved into murderous anarchy. The result: Castro’s soldiers
retreated so ignominiously that Cubans joked that a running shoe should
be named after their commanding officer.

Military tensions eased further after the collapse of the Soviet Union
in 1991 eliminated the financial backing for any further Castro
adventures overseas. But if the temperature dropped a couple of degrees
between Washington and Havana, it blew out the end of the thermometer
between Miami and Castro.

Cuban exiles, taking up where the CIA had left off 30 years earlier,
launched several botched attempts to assassinate Castro. Castro, for his
part, sent a detachment of spies to South Florida with instructions not
only to infiltrate U.S. military installations but to worm their way
inside exile politics.

Thousands of pages of decoded communications between Havana and the
agents — introduced at a 2001 spy trial that resulted in convictions of
five of the men — showed that they were tasked with spreading
disinformation about exile leaders, fomenting dissent within their
groups, ruining Cuban-American politicians and sabotaging the airplanes
of the group Brothers to the Rescue, which patrolled the waters between
Florida and Cuba, looking for rafters fleeing the island.

One spy also was convicted of a murder conspiracy charge after the jury
decided he had helped lure two Brothers to the Rescue planes into a 1996
ambush by Cuban MiGs that ended with the death of four Brothers pilots.
That incident led to one of the most memorable exchanges between
Washington and Havana during Castro’s rule.

Madeleine Albright, then the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations,
released a declassified intelligence transcript of cockpit chatter among
the MiG pilots immediately after the small, unarmed Brothers planes were
shot down, congratulating one another on their “cojones,” or testicles.
“This is not cojones,” snarled Albright. “This is cowardice.”

Elián González
Nothing, however, demonstrated the extent to which Castro and the Miami
exile community had become blood enemies like the saga of Elián
González, the little boy who washed up in South Florida in November 1999
after his mother and 10 others died while bolting Cuba on a raft.

The custody battle over the boy — whether he should stay with relatives
in Miami, or be returned to his father in Cuba — immediately turned into
a political death struggle between some exiles and Castro. Exiles said
returning Elián to Cuba would be like sending a runaway slave back to
the plantation; Castro referred to the exiles as “the Miami mafiosi” and
accused them of “kidnapping” the boy.

Like a general at war, Castro deployed every resource at his command. He
closed factories and schools so that millions of Cubans (some of them
transported hundreds of miles by bus) could join demonstrations
demanding Elián’s return. State radio and TV stations devoted at least
four hours a day to the case. Castro spent, by his own admission, $2
million on T-shirts, posters and billboards to promote the protest, and
even built an amphitheater — Cubans called it the “protest-o-drome” — in
front of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Havana.

His moves paid off. Outside Miami, American public opinion swung in
favor of returning the child to Cuba, and the Clinton administration did
just that.

If the Elián affair was a victory for Castro, it was one of the few
after the Soviet bloc began to crumble in 1989. The loss of $4 billion a
year in aid from Moscow touched off an economic holocaust in Cuba; by
1993, the economy had shrunk nearly 40 percent.

Castro warned Cubans that they were entering a harsh new “special
period,” with even more stringent rationing. Severe shortages cropped up
in virtually every sector of the economy.

By 1994, Castro’s government was in its most perilous state since the
days of the Bay of Pigs. Several small riots erupted, and thousands of
Cubans hurled themselves lemming-like into the sea on flimsy rafts of
plywood and inner tubes, praying to catch a lucky current to Miami.

When Cuban government ships spotted a tugboat full of refugees headed
for Florida on July 13, 1994, they blasted it to pieces with
high-pressure fire hoses. “Our tugboat started taking on water,”
recounted one of the survivors, María Victoria García. “We shouted to
the crewmen on the boat, ‘Look at the children! You’re going to kill
them!’ And they said, ‘Let them die! Let them die!’ ” Forty-one of the
refugees did.

Cornered, Castro loosened some of the strings on the economy. For the
first time, he tried to develop a tourist industry, opening several
luxury hotels in joint ventures with foreign partners. Small businesses
like mom-and-pop restaurants were permitted, and possession of U.S.
dollars was legalized.

In a mark of just how close to the brink the Cuban economy really was,
Castro even welcomed the large-scale return of prostitution, which he
had called a “social illness” in the early days of the revolution. But
in a 1992 speech to the National Assembly, he bragged that the army of
freelance hookers who swarmed through Havana’s streets every night in
search of tourists were the most cultured in the world.

“There are no women forced to sell themselves to a man, to a foreigner,
to a tourist,” Castro said of the women, known as jineteras in local
slang. “Those who do so do it on their own, voluntarily, and without any
need for it. We can say that they are highly educated and quite healthy.”

The fledgling tourist industry (and a steady flow of subsidized oil from
Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez, the latest in a series of Latin American
admirers), succeeded in lessening some of the pressure on Castro’s
government. But by the turn of the millennium, it was apparent that it
also had brought the revolution full circle.

The dream of a Marxist society without social or economic distinctions
was gone. In its place was a rigid class system: those with dollars and
those without. Doctors, lawyers and even nuclear engineers were
abandoning their professions in droves to drive taxis or work as tour
guides, anything to get their hands on dollars instead of nearly
worthless Cuban pesos.

Tenants in Havana’s low-cost colonial tenements watched fearfully as
their neighbors were evicted and their buildings torn down to make room
for quaint new tourist hotels and restaurants. And the Internet bristled
with endorsements of Havana as one of the world’s top sex-tourism spots,
with thousands of pretty women available for the price of a cheap dinner.

If Castro could accept all of that, though, there was still one thing he
couldn’t swallow: political liberalization.

“Do you desire the ruin of Cuba?” he scolded a Canadian journalist who
asked in 2000 if some of the political changes in Russia might not be
good for Cuba, too. “What was the result of Gorbachev’s politics? …
They destroyed the history of the country, demoralized and disarmed the
country, and didn’t do what they should have, and what without a doubt
wanted to do: improve socialism.”

Roundups of dissidents continued regularly through the final years of
Castro’s rule. He might ease the pressure occasionally for
public-relations purposes — several hundred prisoners were released in
advance of Pope John Paul II’s visit to the island in January 1998 — but
inevitably resume when the spotlight moved elsewhere.

“Cuba remains a Latin American anomaly: an undemocratic government that
represses nearly all forms of political dissent,” the independent group
Human Rights Watch observed in 2008. “Cubans are systematically denied
basic rights to free expression, association, assembly, privacy,
movement, and due process of law.”

The beleaguered Cuban population’s response was a retreat into sullen
despair. By the 1990s, the island’s suicide rate had trippled from
pre-revolutionary levels, and one of every three pregnancies ended in
abortion. The birth rate dropped so low that Cubans weren’t even
replacing themselves: Women average fewer than two children apiece.

By the time Castro left the Cuban presidency in early 2008, the
country’s rapidly aging population was the second-oldest in Latin
America. A fifth of the country had hit retirement age, and the
percentage was steadily rising. The workers weren’t the only thing
geriatric about the Cuban economy: Its industrial underpinning of
ancient Soviet factories and machinery was crumbling. In 2007,
production of 14 of Cuba’s 20 key products was lower than in 1989. One,
the sugar crop, was the smallest in a hundred years.

If any of this concerned Castro, it was not apparent. Though he churned
out a copius stream of essays and op-ed pieces for the Cuban press in
his final years, they were markedly devoid of regrets or even
introspection. “I distrust the seemingly easy path of apologetics or its
antithesis of self-flagellation,” he wrote in the letter announcing his
2008 retirement.

That letter marked a formal end to a process that began in August 2006
when Castro said an abdominal illness would require surgery and he was
placing the reins of government in the hands of his brother Raúl. The
illness was never precisely identified, though it was widely speculated
to be some form of gastrointestinal cancer.

Whatever it was, it took an abrupt and catastrophic toll. Castro was
rarely seen again in public for the rest of his life, though he
occasionally appeared in photos or videos released by the government — a
slow and shaky man, dozens of pounds wasted from his once imposing
frame, but still capable of needling his enemies to the north. In a
video released shortly after news stories circulated that the George W.
Bush administration believed he had terminal cancer, Castro snorted:
‘Now they’ll have to resuscitate me, huh?”

Nevertheless, his decline continued. He occasionally met or spoke by
phone with the new generation of leftist leaders popping up around Latin
America like Ecuador’s Evo Morales, Panama’s Martin Torrijos and
especially Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez, who used his oil money to prop up
Cuba’s economy with billions of dollars of aid. But the chats with
Chávez, the new icon of the Latin American left, only served as a
reminder that Castro had, without anyone noticing, slipped from the
headlines into history.

Even the rambling columns Castro published after his official retirement
dwindled to disjointed notes of a couple paragraphs each, cryptic haikus
about ancient communist feuds, miraculous health foods and the mystic
powers of yoga. By mid-2012, they had vanished altogether.

The most conclusive evidence that age or illness had reduced Castro to
irrelevance came in December 2014, when President Obama and Raúl Castro
jointly announced that the two nations had agreed to not only swap
captured spies (including the Cuban intelligence officer convicted of
conspiracy to murder in the shootdown of the Brothers to the Rescue
planes) but resume full diplomatic relations.

Obam, in his speech, called the developments the “most significant
changes” in America’s Cuba policy in more than 50 years and said they
were negotiated in a series of secret meetings that lasted 18 months and
ended with an hour-long phone call between the president and Raúl
Castro. He didn’t speak the name Fidel Castro once. And in Havana, at
the various ceremonies hailing the new agreement, Fidel was neither seen
nor heard of.

Achievements tarnished
Will history absolve Fidel Castro, as he allegedly told the court in
Santiago in 1953?

His revolution made undeniable gains in education and health care,
raising literacy and slashing infant mortality. But his critics note
that other Latin American nations like Costa Rica made improvements,
too, without sacrificing their economies or their civil liberties.

Even Cuba scholars who think that Castro made significant achievements
in the early years of the revolution believe that his insistence on
clinging to power seriously damaged the country.

“By hanging onto power even into the early twenty-first century, all he
did was to tarnish his past accomplishments. It is almost as if he had a
self-destructive streak for his last twenty years in office,” said
Harvard political scientist Jorge Domínguez.

“History cannot absolve Fidel Castro by the standards he set over 60
years ago,” he added, “but history will surely record him as the most
significant political leader who reshaped Cuban history and as one of
the world’s leading political figures of the second half of the 20th
century.”

Others are less charitable. “To think that he had in his hands the
possibility of making a country great and he made it tiny and poor,”
said Ana Rodríguez, a Miami medical technician who spent 19 years in
prison under Castro, the regime’s longest-held female political
prisoner. “It is sad.”

Castro could be stunningly acute when it came to politics. Not long
before Chilean President Salvador Allende was toppled in a 1973 military
coup, Castro warned him that his government was in danger. When
Nicaragua’s Communist Sandinista government signed a regional accord
calling for political liberalization in 1987, Castro accurately
predicted that the Sandinistas had opened a Pandora’s box that would
destroy them. In a 1989 speech, he forecast the demise of the Soviet Union.

But his perceptions seemed to fail him when it came to Cuba. “Now that
the capitalists and imperialists think that the ideas of socialism,
communism and Marxism-Leninism are collapsing, we are more confident
than ever in the ideas of Marxism-Leninism,” Castro said in a speech
Nov. 7, 1989, just two days before the Berlin Wall fell, committing his
country to go it alone.

In his final years, Castro seemed curiously unconcerned with his image,
at times lurching dangerously close to self-parody. Miami Herald
columnist Andres Oppenheimer, in his book Castro’s Final Hour, described
a three-hour speech on Che Guevara’s application of dialectics that
Castro delivered in 1991 — to an audience of 6-year-olds.

Soon after, Castro allowed his photo be used in advertisements for the
Benetton shops. The ember-eyed young man who vowed to destroy bourgeois
decadence and the conspicuous consumption of capitalism had become one
of its throw-away poster boys.

Perhaps it was the only way the world’s last, lonely Communist could get
anyone’s attention.

Miami Herald staff writers Mimi Whitefield and Sue Mullin contributed to
this story, which also used reporting by former Herald staffers Jane
Bussey, Elaine De Valle, Martin McReynolds and Elisabeth Donovan.

Source: Former Cuban President Fidel Castro dead at age 90 | Miami
Herald –
www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/fidel-castro-en/article117186483.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *